Today I’m in D.C. for the Conservative Political Action Conference, held at the Marriott Washington Wardman Park. I’ll be on a live (at FoxNews.com) edition of Freedom Watch around 12:30, then speaking in the Delaware room at 2:00. At 3:30 I’ll be signing books at the Campaign for Liberty booth in the exhibit hall. At 8:30pm I’m emceeing an event with Ron Paul and Judge Andrew Napolitano in Thurgood Marshall South/West. Should be fun!
In case you are losing sleep over this burning question, you can Google a four-part (yes, a four-part) series on this issue over at the website of Chronicles magazine.
The author is Thomas Storck, whom I have tangled with in the past, even before I published The Church and the Market: A Catholic Defense of the Free Economy. (I also recommend this article by Gerard Casey, head of the department of philosophy at University College, Dublin.) He and I recently had an exchange in the Catholic Social Science Review. Here is his article and here is my reply. You may decide for yourself who was the victor.
One of my points — a pretty obvious one, or so I thought, for anyone who understands the contours of ecclesiastical authority — is that the Church cannot pronounce on the mechanics of the cause-and-effect relationships that exist in the sciences. Two parts hydrogen, one part oxygen either make water or they do not. Wages are either increased this way or they are increased that way. These facts may help us form our moral conclusions, but they are, obviously, not themselves subject to moral critique. Something either works a particular way or it doesn’t.
Storck continues to argue that the Church must have the authority in some cases to declare that the sciences are “simply wrong.” Thus if economics says wages rise by doing X, but the statements of prelates seem to imply that they can rise by doing Y, then so much the worse for economics. If we allow the cause-and-effect relationships in economics to exist autonomously (again, he speaks as if cause-and-effect relationships could be subject to moral rebuke!), he demands, then “where does it end?” He says a psychologist could then say that promiscuity leads to human flourishing, and that I would be helpless to object.
I trust my readers have already spotted the fallacy, but just in case: even in this situation the proper objection is not to the cause-and-effect relationships. The psychologist’s research could in fact be unimpeachable: behavior A may well lead to emotional state B. The question is whether emotional state B in fact constitutes human flourishing. This is a philosophical/theological question, not a technical question involving the operation of forces in the natural world, and thus falls well within the province of the Church.
I understand the magazine’s irascible editor, Thomas Fleming, is calling people at LewRockwell.com (and, by extension, me) “ignorant, pseudo-Catholic poseurs.” Classy, as usual. When Tom has anything like a book whose Spanish translation features a foreword by the Prefect of the Vatican’s Congregation for Worship and the former Primate of Spain, a highly regarded layman’s guide to the old Latin Mass, or a sympathetic study of Progressive Era Catholicism, published by an Ivy League press, that’s been hailed in the major historical and theological journals, he can let me know. I’ll wait by the phone.
I dream of a world in which an economics professor who intends to spout Keynesian propaganda trembles as he enters the classroom. Here’s my talk on Keynesian predictions and American history.
A speech in Greenville, South Carolina.
Here’s my reply to the idiocies we’re taught in government drone factories.
Thomas E. Woods, Jr., is the New York Times bestselling author of nine books. A senior fellow at the Ludwig von Mises Institute, Woods holds a bachelor's degree in history from Harvard and his master's, M.Phil., and Ph.D. from Columbia University. Read more »
"Well written, well researched, and the thesis put forth is well argued.... Woods has opened up an area of historical analysis that
should invite further study."
Journal of American History
"A marvelous read. Every chapter taught me something new and unexpected."
Tom Bethell, senior editor, The American Spectator
"I strongly recommend Woods's work."
The Honorable Ron Paul,
U.S. House of Representatives
"A must-read."
Barron's
"An excellent reading source for anyone interested in financial markets, and much more so for anyone interested in learning about
capitalism without all the misinterpretations being thrown about in the financial media."
Asia Times
"Written with great clarity and fluency, making the complex philosophical and theological concepts approachable."
Journal of American Studies
"Provocative, well-written, and deserves to be read."
Catholic Historical Review
"An engaging and important contribution to scholarship on the history of American Catholicism."
Journal of the Historical Society
"Woods and [co-author Kevin] Gutzman appeal to both left and right in this constitutionalist jeremiad…. The authors' exegeses of the Constitution and court decisions, heavy on original intent arguments, are lucid and telling."
Publishers Weekly
"The hottest book today is Meltdown, by my friend Tom Woods."
Judge Andrew Napolitano, senior judicial analyst,
FOX News Channel
"Should be required reading."
Economic Affairs (London)
"Woods, one of the best classical liberal [libertarian] scholars of his generation, has once more placed us in his debt with this lucid and tightly argued book."
David Gordon, The Mises Review